Skip to content

IbisGraph vs Other Graph Processing Solutions

Overview

This document provides an honest comparison between IbisGraph and other graph processing solutions. The goal is to help you understand when IbisGraph might be appropriate for your use case, and more importantly, when it might not be the best choice.

Core Differences in Approach

IbisGraph takes a unique approach by translating Pregel-style graph algorithms into SQL operations that run directly in your data warehouse or lake. This is fundamentally different from:

  • In-memory graph libraries (NetworkX, igraph): Process graphs entirely in memory on a single machine
  • Specialized graph databases (Neo4j, TigerGraph): Store and process data in specialized graph-native formats

Performance Characteristics

Single-Node Performance

Let's be clear: IbisGraph will be slower than specialized solutions for most operations:

Operation        | NetworkX/igraph | Neo4j    | IbisGraph
-----------------|----------------|----------|----------
PageRank         | Very Fast      | Fast     | Slow
Path Finding    | Very Fast      | Fast     | Slow
Community Det.   | Very Fast      | Fast     | Slow

This performance gap exists by design because: 1. IbisGraph translates graph operations into SQL, adding overhead 2. Data warehouse engines are optimized for different workloads 3. The Pregel model requires multiple iterations with SQL operations each time

Scaling Characteristics

However, the picture changes with scale:

Data Size  | NetworkX/igraph | Neo4j      | IbisGraph
-----------|----------------|------------|------------
Small      | Excellent     | Very Good  | Poor
Medium     | Poor*         | Good       | Good
Large      | Fails*        | Varies**   | Good
Very Large | Fails*        | Varies**    | Works***

* Requires loading entire graph into memory
** Depends on Neo4j cluster size/configuration
*** Limited by underlying data warehouse capabilities

When to Use IbisGraph

Good Use Cases

  1. Data Already in a Warehouse

    • You have graph-structured data in Snowflake, BigQuery, etc.
    • Data volume makes extraction impractical
    • Security policies prevent data movement

  2. Analytical Workflows

    • Graph analysis is part of a larger analytical pipeline
    • Results feed into other SQL-based processing
    • Regular batch processing of graph algorithms

  3. Resource Constraints

    • Cannot justify dedicated graph database infrastructure
    • Need to leverage existing data warehouse investment
    • Data size exceeds single-machine memory

Poor Use Cases

  1. Performance-Critical Operations

    • Real-time graph queries needed
    • Path finding in user-facing applications
    • Interactive graph exploration

  2. Small Graphs

    • Graphs that easily fit in memory
    • One-off analyses
    • Development/prototyping work

  3. Graph-Native Operations

    • Heavy use of graph-specific optimizations
    • Complex traversal patterns
    • Graph-native algorithms

Specific Comparisons

vs NetworkX/igraph

NetworkX/igraph Advantages

  • Much faster execution on small-medium graphs
  • Rich ecosystem of algorithms
  • More intuitive API for graph operations
  • Great for research and prototyping
  • Extensive visualization capabilities

IbisGraph Advantages

  • No memory limitations from source data warehouse
  • No need to move data out of warehouse
  • Integrates with existing data pipelines
  • Scales with warehouse resources
  • Maintains data governance/security

vs Neo4j/TigerGraph

Neo4j/TigerGraph Advantages

  • Optimized graph storage format
  • Native graph processing engines
  • Rich query languages (Cypher, GSQL)
  • Better for OLTP graph workloads
  • Superior path-finding performance

IbisGraph Advantages

  • No separate infrastructure required
  • Uses existing data warehouse skills (SQL)
  • No ETL to separate graph store
  • Automatic scaling with warehouse
  • Lower total cost of ownership

Implementation Comparison

Aspect          | NetworkX | Neo4j  | IbisGraph
----------------|----------|--------|----------
Storage         | RAM      | Native | SQL Tables
Query Language  | Python   | Cypher | SQL/Ibis
Scale Limit     | RAM      | Disk   | Warehouse
Learning Curve  | Low      | Medium | Low*
Setup Effort    | Minimal  | High   | None**

* If already familiar with SQL/Ibis
** Assuming data warehouse exists

Real-World Considerations

Data Movement

Moving data out of a warehouse into specialized tools often brings challenges:

  1. Security & Compliance

    • Data governance policies
    • Audit requirements
    • Access controls

  2. Infrastructure

    • Network bandwidth
    • Additional storage
    • New system maintenance

  3. Time & Resources

    • ETL development
    • System setup/maintenance
    • Training requirements

IbisGraph sidesteps these issues by processing data in place.

Cost Considerations

While IbisGraph's performance characteristics might seem inferior, consider the total cost:

Cost Factor          | NetworkX | Neo4j    | IbisGraph
--------------------|----------|----------|------------
Infrastructure      | Low      | High     | Existing
Maintenance         | Low      | High     | Existing
Training            | Low      | High     | Low
Data Movement       | High     | High     | None
Performance Cost    | Low      | Low      | High*

* In terms of compute resources used per operation

Conclusion

IbisGraph is not trying to compete with NetworkX/igraph for small graph processing or Neo4j for graph-native operations. Instead, it fills a specific niche:

Best For:

  • Processing graph data already in data warehouses
  • When data movement is impractical or prohibited
  • When existing SQL infrastructure must be leveraged
  • When graph operations are part of larger data pipelines

Avoid When:

  • Performance is critical
  • Graphs easily fit in memory
  • Specialized graph operations are needed
  • Setting up a proper graph database is feasible

The key is understanding these trade-offs and choosing the right tool for your specific needs. IbisGraph's value proposition isn't better performance or more features - it's the ability to perform graph operations where your data already lives.